ABSTRACT
Pancreatic fistula is a common complication after distal pancreatectomy, and its occurrence will increase the risk of other postoperative complications and even lead to the death of patients. Although the grading diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula has been widely applied, the diagnosis of grade B pancreatic fistula is relatively broad. Further stratification is needed to assist in the disease severity assessment and treatment of postoperative patients. In terms of the prevention of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, there are still controversies in the aspects of intraoperative operation, early postoperative nutritional support, the timing of drainage tube removal, and the use of somatostatin analogs. Therefore, this article will discuss many problems including grading and prevention of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, to provide a more persuasive clinical basis.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of laparoscopy dominated approaches to two different local resections for duodenal stromal tumors.Methods:From May 2015 to May 2021 25 duodenal stromal tumors cases were allocated to wedged resection group (8 cases) and segmental resection (17cases).Results:Compared with the segmental resection group, the operative time in the wedge resection group was significantly shorter [(202±43) min vs. (299±128) min, t=-2.814, P=0.010]. The intraoperative blood loss was 20 (10-50) ml in the wedge resection group and 30 (15-100) ml in the segmental resection group ( t=-1.128, P>0.05). Patients in the wedge resection group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay, 7(9-11) days vs. 14 (10-28) days, t=-2.66, P=0.008. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and gastric emptying disorders between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In spite of laparoscopic,robotic or open approaches, wedge resection and segmental resection based on anatomic location for duodenal stromal tumors are both safe and satisfactory.